|
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Support Ted Cruz and his Jobs Growth & Freedom Fund
Saturday, November 9, 2013
Breaking Bad - Mitch McConnell resorts to political thuggery against Conservatives
|
Saturday, November 2, 2013
Support Conservative Matt Bevin - Primary out Harry Reid appeaser Mitch McConnell in #KYsen
We have a chance to #DitchMitch and elect a principled Conservative in Kentucky. Follow Matt Bevin on twitter here https://twitter.com/MattBevin And on Facebook here https://www.facebook.com/mattbevinforkentucky and check out his website and donate here http://www.mattbevin.com
Listing of Matt Bevin's upcoming events. Get involved!
Friday, October 11, 2013
Freedom Seeker Endorses Conservative Mike Stopa in the #MA05 Congressional Primary
The editorial board at Freedom Seeker has enthusiastically endorsed Mike Stopa in the #MA05 Congressional Election. We need a trustworthy, principled Conservative to work tirelessly to articulate Republican principles and values. Mike will fight for jobs, life, liberty and prosperity in DC for we the people of Massachusetts. Mike is a passionate supporter of the free market, and deeply opposed to the unfairness of giving legalization status to illegal aliens, and will stand against Obamacare.
We view Mike Stopa as the candidate most willing and able to stand up to the crony politicians of both parties in Washington DC. Mike values smaller government and his stand against Obamacare shows he is willing to take on Washington’s continued abuses on our liberties.
We encourage voters in Massachusetts to give all their support to Mike Stopa and not drink the media Kool Aid and listen to the consultants who tell us conservatives can't win in certain areas.
For more info check out Mike Stopa's website here http://www.mikestopama.com/index.html
Saturday, September 28, 2013
Obama Admin signing of UN Gun treaty "raises significant … constitutional questions"
King Obama does not have the authority to Cede United States Constitutional authority to a Global National Organization (UN). This is offensive, Un Constitutional and potentially treasonous and must be STOPPED.
Great Read from the NRA below:
Kerry Signs Global Gun Control Accord in Wake of Obama's Renewed Calls for "Transformation"
Posted on September 27, 2013
Shortly before he was reelected, President Obama proclaimed to the rapturous cheers and applause of his supporters, "We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America."
Many at the time wondered exactly what sort of "fundamental transformation" was needed in what was already the most prosperous, peaceful, just, egalitarian, and powerful nation the world has ever known. A simple return to first principles, some would argue, is the better prescription to preserve the country's preeminence in the future.
Nevertheless, taking his cues directly from the anti-gunner's playbook we reported on recently, President Obama last Sunday turned a memorial service for victims of a heinous crime into a platform to call for yet another "transformation," this one in the federal gun laws under which the nation's violent crime rate has fallen to a 42-year low. In a breathtaking display of opportunism and self-centeredness, an event meant to display a nation's mourning and remembrance degenerated into an expression of the president's personal agenda and his vision of a "transformed" America.
As with Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who remarked last year that she "would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012," the president found inspiration in the examples of foreign nations. Despite America's falling violent crime rate, the president scolded the nation that gun violence "ought to obsess us" and invoked the United Kingdom and Australia as modeling the correct paradigm. After "just a single mass shooting occurred in those countries," he said, "they … mobilized and they changed …."
Let that sink in for a moment. The President of the United States "honored" America's dead by calling on the nation to model its gun control policies after the very monarchy from which it won its independence. Of course, America's existence as a sovereign country was itself achieved in part through the use of privately-owned firearms and after British authorities had attempted to disarm American colonists. Somewhere, Piers Morgan, to say nothing of King George III, must have felt vindicated by the president's remarks.
A website coincidentally published by the University of Sydney in Australia summarizes the British gun control that the president referenced, with links to relevant provisions of British law. The "right to private gun ownership is not guaranteed by law," it states. That much is obvious by citing just a few specifics: "Civilians" are not allowed to possess semi-automatic firearms or handguns. Acquisition, possession, or transfer of a firearm or ammunition requires a license, and applicants for such licenses are required "to prove genuine reason to possess a firearm." Each firearm must be registered, and carrying a firearm in public, whether openly or concealed, is prohibited. Firearm licensees, moreover, may only possess "approved" quantities of ammunition. Similar polices apply in Australia. Transformative, in short, would be an understatement.
The extent to which the president seeks international guidance for American gun control became even more evident three days later, when Secretary of State John Kerry signed the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty on behalf of the Obama administration. Secretary Kerry marked the event by stating, "The United States is proud to have worked with our international partners in order to achieve this important step towards a … more peaceful world, but a world that also lives by international standards and rules."
We have often reported on the dangers posed by the broad and inherently ambiguous language of the Arms Trade Treaty. While it purports to focus on international trade in such items as "[b]attle tanks," "[c]ombat aircraft" and "[w]arships," its inclusion of "small arms and light weapons" is universally understood to encompass ordinary firearms. This is underscored by the treaty's non-binding, preambular reference to "the legitimate trade and lawful ownership, and use of certain conventional arms for recreational, cultural, historical, and sporting activities, where such trade, ownership, and use are permitted or protected by law." Needless to say, "battle tanks" and "warships" are nowhere used for "recreational" and "sporting" activities.
On the other hand, while the treaty recognizes the "inherent right of all States to individual or collective self-defence [sic]" (emphasis added), it nowhere acknowledges what the United States Supreme Court called the "central component" of the Second Amendment--the right of individual persons to self-defense.
Among many other things, the treaty establishes factors a participating country would have to consider before authorizing an export of covered arms to another country, including whether the exported arms would "contribute to or undermine peace and security" or the risk of their "being used to commit or facilitate serous acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children …." To mitigate these supposed risks, the exporting state could extract "confidence building measures" from the importing state.
To this end, "Each importing State Party shall take measures to ensure that appropriate and relevant information is provided, upon request, pursuant to its national laws, to the exporting State Party, to assist the exporting State Party in conducting its national risk assessment …. Such measures may include end use or end user documentation."
In other words, even if the United States never ratifies the treaty, it could be subject, as a condition of receiving firearms exported from a participating nation, to a requirement to hand over lists of individual "end users" of such guns. Thus, the stage is set for the United States either to be ostracized as an outlier in the global gun control community or to establish a national registry of firearms imported from other countries, as well as the Americans who eventually own them. Worse, the exporting nation could insist this registry be provided to it for "risk assessment" purposes.
The October 2013 edition of America's First Freedom reports on a draft document known as ISACS (International Small Arms Control Standard) 03.30, produced as part of the U.N.'s efforts to get countries to "voluntarily" adopt gun control. Its standards, not coincidentally, echo those described above with respect to Australia and England. Eventually, the ISACS 03.30 standards could be considered best practices to implement the treaty. As the article notes, "once a critical mass of countries voluntarily adopt the standards, they could attain the status of an international 'norm' and be used to portray the United States as a 'rogue nation' on the subject." The result could be restrictions on America's ability to engage in international trade in firearms and ammunition or even "changes in domestic policy as a result of international pressure to conform."
How real is the danger? Incredibly, while the Obama administration was eager to embrace this global regime, Canada has, for now, declined, citing concerns over how it would affect lawful firearm owners and it possible links to firearm registration (Canada recently abolished a national registry of long guns).
Fortunately, though, members of Congress are already mobilizing in opposition. On Tuesday, Senator James Inhofe (R–Okla.) sent a letter to Secretary Kerry expressing opposition to the signing, while Senator Bob Corker (R–Tenn.)warned the administration that the treaty "raises significant … constitutional questions" and must not be implemented by executive action unless and until the treaty is ratified by the Senate and Congress has passed its own implementing legislation.
We urge you to contact your U.S. Senators and Representative to express your firm opposition to this treaty (you can contact your Senators by phone at (202) 224-3121, and your Representative by phone at (202) 225-3121). Further, we call on the United States Congress to reject this imposition on American sovereignty and its attempt to interpret away the Second Amendment rights of Americans with oppressive international "norms."
Many at the time wondered exactly what sort of "fundamental transformation" was needed in what was already the most prosperous, peaceful, just, egalitarian, and powerful nation the world has ever known. A simple return to first principles, some would argue, is the better prescription to preserve the country's preeminence in the future.
Nevertheless, taking his cues directly from the anti-gunner's playbook we reported on recently, President Obama last Sunday turned a memorial service for victims of a heinous crime into a platform to call for yet another "transformation," this one in the federal gun laws under which the nation's violent crime rate has fallen to a 42-year low. In a breathtaking display of opportunism and self-centeredness, an event meant to display a nation's mourning and remembrance degenerated into an expression of the president's personal agenda and his vision of a "transformed" America.
As with Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who remarked last year that she "would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012," the president found inspiration in the examples of foreign nations. Despite America's falling violent crime rate, the president scolded the nation that gun violence "ought to obsess us" and invoked the United Kingdom and Australia as modeling the correct paradigm. After "just a single mass shooting occurred in those countries," he said, "they … mobilized and they changed …."
Let that sink in for a moment. The President of the United States "honored" America's dead by calling on the nation to model its gun control policies after the very monarchy from which it won its independence. Of course, America's existence as a sovereign country was itself achieved in part through the use of privately-owned firearms and after British authorities had attempted to disarm American colonists. Somewhere, Piers Morgan, to say nothing of King George III, must have felt vindicated by the president's remarks.
A website coincidentally published by the University of Sydney in Australia summarizes the British gun control that the president referenced, with links to relevant provisions of British law. The "right to private gun ownership is not guaranteed by law," it states. That much is obvious by citing just a few specifics: "Civilians" are not allowed to possess semi-automatic firearms or handguns. Acquisition, possession, or transfer of a firearm or ammunition requires a license, and applicants for such licenses are required "to prove genuine reason to possess a firearm." Each firearm must be registered, and carrying a firearm in public, whether openly or concealed, is prohibited. Firearm licensees, moreover, may only possess "approved" quantities of ammunition. Similar polices apply in Australia. Transformative, in short, would be an understatement.
The extent to which the president seeks international guidance for American gun control became even more evident three days later, when Secretary of State John Kerry signed the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty on behalf of the Obama administration. Secretary Kerry marked the event by stating, "The United States is proud to have worked with our international partners in order to achieve this important step towards a … more peaceful world, but a world that also lives by international standards and rules."
We have often reported on the dangers posed by the broad and inherently ambiguous language of the Arms Trade Treaty. While it purports to focus on international trade in such items as "[b]attle tanks," "[c]ombat aircraft" and "[w]arships," its inclusion of "small arms and light weapons" is universally understood to encompass ordinary firearms. This is underscored by the treaty's non-binding, preambular reference to "the legitimate trade and lawful ownership, and use of certain conventional arms for recreational, cultural, historical, and sporting activities, where such trade, ownership, and use are permitted or protected by law." Needless to say, "battle tanks" and "warships" are nowhere used for "recreational" and "sporting" activities.
On the other hand, while the treaty recognizes the "inherent right of all States to individual or collective self-defence [sic]" (emphasis added), it nowhere acknowledges what the United States Supreme Court called the "central component" of the Second Amendment--the right of individual persons to self-defense.
Among many other things, the treaty establishes factors a participating country would have to consider before authorizing an export of covered arms to another country, including whether the exported arms would "contribute to or undermine peace and security" or the risk of their "being used to commit or facilitate serous acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children …." To mitigate these supposed risks, the exporting state could extract "confidence building measures" from the importing state.
To this end, "Each importing State Party shall take measures to ensure that appropriate and relevant information is provided, upon request, pursuant to its national laws, to the exporting State Party, to assist the exporting State Party in conducting its national risk assessment …. Such measures may include end use or end user documentation."
In other words, even if the United States never ratifies the treaty, it could be subject, as a condition of receiving firearms exported from a participating nation, to a requirement to hand over lists of individual "end users" of such guns. Thus, the stage is set for the United States either to be ostracized as an outlier in the global gun control community or to establish a national registry of firearms imported from other countries, as well as the Americans who eventually own them. Worse, the exporting nation could insist this registry be provided to it for "risk assessment" purposes.
The October 2013 edition of America's First Freedom reports on a draft document known as ISACS (International Small Arms Control Standard) 03.30, produced as part of the U.N.'s efforts to get countries to "voluntarily" adopt gun control. Its standards, not coincidentally, echo those described above with respect to Australia and England. Eventually, the ISACS 03.30 standards could be considered best practices to implement the treaty. As the article notes, "once a critical mass of countries voluntarily adopt the standards, they could attain the status of an international 'norm' and be used to portray the United States as a 'rogue nation' on the subject." The result could be restrictions on America's ability to engage in international trade in firearms and ammunition or even "changes in domestic policy as a result of international pressure to conform."
How real is the danger? Incredibly, while the Obama administration was eager to embrace this global regime, Canada has, for now, declined, citing concerns over how it would affect lawful firearm owners and it possible links to firearm registration (Canada recently abolished a national registry of long guns).
Fortunately, though, members of Congress are already mobilizing in opposition. On Tuesday, Senator James Inhofe (R–Okla.) sent a letter to Secretary Kerry expressing opposition to the signing, while Senator Bob Corker (R–Tenn.)warned the administration that the treaty "raises significant … constitutional questions" and must not be implemented by executive action unless and until the treaty is ratified by the Senate and Congress has passed its own implementing legislation.
We urge you to contact your U.S. Senators and Representative to express your firm opposition to this treaty (you can contact your Senators by phone at (202) 224-3121, and your Representative by phone at (202) 225-3121). Further, we call on the United States Congress to reject this imposition on American sovereignty and its attempt to interpret away the Second Amendment rights of Americans with oppressive international "norms."
Saturday, September 21, 2013
Another Mass Democrat added to 2013's National Most Corrupt list
Great summary below of the longtime Democrat Rep. John Tierney addition to the 2013 "Most Corrupt" List. Tierney has a long history and ties to a family illegal gambling ring, tax fraud, alleged racketeering and crime syndicate activities. In a move that will surely get him exalted status in the Mass Dem Hall of Fame! He's appealing to his grassroots base for sure!
See the list of more Indicted Democrat politicians in Massachusetts - @MassDems Hall of Fame! http://buff.ly/15t8JyH
|
Saturday, September 14, 2013
God is in the Conservative Liberty Party platform
I Pledge Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and justice for all.
Saturday, August 24, 2013
If you cross the US borders illegally you will get? This is OUTRAGEOUS!
The American ideal is that we are “a nation of laws, not of men,” John Adams
That is under siege and The Obama Administration is working against the Constitution and against existing laws. This is OUTRAGEOUS. Please read more below and support Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
|
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Republican David Steinhof 6th Bristol Special election is 9/10/13 - Updates
David Steinhof General Election Kickoff Fundraiser is Tuesday August 13th at 7:30 - Link to Event here https://www.facebook.com/events/1397964473754127/ Former Senator Scott Brown is scheduled to attend. Listed as going are Dean Cavaratta, Angela Davis, Rebeca Levesque, Brian Kennedy, Mark Townsend, Dan Edmunds and Jon Norsu. Spread the word and get involved!
You can support David at his website here http://www.davidsteinhof.com Or on Facebook here https://www.facebook.com/pages/David-Steinhof-for-State-Representative/187729484722272?fref=ts
Sunday, July 28, 2013
List of Democrats who flip-flopped and voted YES on Massachusetts Massive tax hike
Yet more political chicanery from the Mass Dem's. Massive Gas taxes and $500 Million more for the liberals to spend - on backs of taxpayers. It's time to start moving our businesses and families out of this state... See Mass GOP press release for more details on recent tax hike news.
|
Tuesday, July 9, 2013
Why ObamaCare is a train wreck - Summarized in one Picture
Forget the 20+ Obamacare taxes that are destroying jobs, forget that the IRS is going to enforce it, forget that it is not "free" and is in fact skyrocketing costs, forget that King Obama had to delay the Obamacare business mandate to save Democrat seats in #2014, forget that Socialized medicine will lead to rationed and watered down healthcare... This flowchart exemplifies the train wreck that is Obamacare.
Wednesday, July 3, 2013
Massachusetts anti-gun Hearings - Need Pro 2nd Amendment support & help
If you can attend - please help stand up for our freedom and the Constitution. Contact your state reps as well. The Democrats are coming for your guns, and doing nothing about crime control. Yet more draconian restrictions on the responsible gunowners... Please see the NRA legislative alert on below:
|
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Support Conservative Jim Bridenstine from Oklahoma - via Senate Conservative Fund
| ||
|
Saturday, June 22, 2013
Gabriel Gomez crushing Ed Markey in #MAsen newspaper endorsements
Ed Markey's listless campaign & non descript 37 year hard left DC partisan crony record highlighted by; anti jobs votes on Mass Medical devices, Fishing industry killing NOAA votes, Manufacturing job killing NAFTA votes, Raising taxes on middle class 271 time, Living in Maryland full time - it is clear Ed Markey is out of touch with Massachusetts voters. Other than Liberal state run media outlets Boston Globe and Cape Codder Times Gabriel Gomez is dominating the endorsement race. This is almost unprecedented for a Republican candidate and speaks volumes for the disdain for a terrible Democrat nominee in Ed Markey.
In sharp contrast upstart and insurgent Republican +Gabriel Gomez is campaigning statewide and getting his pro business, pro job growth, pro common sense reform message out. I will let the impressive Newspaper endorsement list and their observations and words speak for themselves.
Endorsement: Gomez for Senate - Worcester Telegram & Gazette http://worc.tg/13LhP7y Central Mass going for Gabriel Gomez.
Boston Herald Editorial endorsement: Gabriel Gomez for Senate http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/opinion/editorials/2013/06/editorial_endorsement_gomez_for_senate
El Pueblo Latino of Springfield endorses Gabriel Gomez for Senate: "Gomez, a descendent from... http://bit.ly/19bX5LO
Eagle Tribune endorsement: Gabriel Gomez is the kind of leader we need in Washington http://www.eagletribune.com/opinion/x2113333322/Gabriel-Gomez-is-the-kind-of-leader-we-need-in-Washington
Endorsement: The Salem News: Our view: For U.S. Senate, Gabriel Gomez http://www.salemnews.com/opinion/x14722
Endorsement: Let Gabriel Gomez show what he can do - Lowell Sun Online http://www.lowellsun.com/opinion/ci_23500657/let-gabriel-gomez-show-what-he-can-do
SEND A SEAL to WASHINGTON! SOFA has endorsed @GomezForMA for U.S. Senate in #MAsen Special Election http://fb.me/2OjKoQQGW
Newburyport Daily News: Our view: Gabriel Gomez for U.S. Senate http://t.co/y068p8Y9RQ #masen
El Mundo - Vote for Gabriel Gomez http://t.co/W7S6OIWUyt #masen #latism
Sentinel & Enterprise endorses @GomezForMA #MASen #CMass http://t.co/8zgj9gt4RP
Gabriel Gomez: Proud to have earned the endorsement of New England Police Benevolent Association Local 911 #MASen http://t.co/Ahp5yung8E
And > SUPERMAN endorsed Gabriel Gomez for U.S. Senate! Vote June 25th. #shakethemup #gameon http://t.co/kaZXuqsIfw
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)